On Becoming A Person By Rogers,cr (1961)

On Becoming a Person , by Carl RogersReview and AnalysisByIrene LugoCNSL 259George upper-case earn University On Becoming a Person , by Carl RogersReview and AnalysisWhat is the salutary bread and butter ? That is the interrogative mood Carl Rogers attempts to answer . The concomitant that this particular question was central to his search set Rogers apart(predicate) from some of his Freudian contemporaries . For Rogers , query in psychological science was only utile to the extent that it helped peopleIn On Becoming a Person , Rogers does not claim to have all the answers His object is simply to be little wrong . In that smell out , he is victorious . His methods ar more attuned to the patients needs , and less theory impelled than the common methods of his dayWhat Causes BehaviorResearch , in the 1960 s , often p ointed toward many gentleity behaviors as be biologically base . Rogers disagreed with this judgement . To Rogers , psychological research was often self-fulfilling . Carrying a pre-stated hypothesis into research in and of itself make it more likely that the hypothesis would be proven authentic . Rogers d bearplays the role of Biology . He believes that the human being is a free thinking individual who makes decisions based upon run throughThe Good LifeAchieving the mature lifetime to Rogers is not simply the stretch at a point in time when atomic number 53 s needs atomic number 18 satisfied . The human being is a dynamic , evolutionary being . therefore , the well-behaved life is an ongoing growth toward openness . The person who is not open to psychological experiences , good and bad , ordain become stagnant and unhappy . jibe to Rogers in On Becoming a PersonExperience , for me , the highest authority . The meter of validityis my own experience . No other p erson s ideas , and of my ownideas , are a! s determinate as my experience (1961Experience , by itself elicitnot countenance the good life . How do we react to that experience ?

The revenant process of tell this question is what constitutes good . Inherent in that process is decorous more open to feelings , emotions and senses . There is a part of the assessment responsible for value judgments and decisions , that we don t fancy Through his own observation , Rogers has learned this muchMan s behavior is delicately rational .The calamity for most of usis that our defenses keep us from being aware of this .we are movingin one direction , while orgasmically we are moving in anotherThis statement separates Rogers from many theo reticians of the past . It resists the judgement that we are biologically wired to make decisions We are creatures who are continuously in development . This is wherefore the good life is , in the depot , a direction and not a destination (Rogers 1961There are elements to human decision making that , Rogers admits , we can t understand . This is why the question arises Is the good life ineluctably good For Rogers , the good life occurs when a person is psychologically free adequacy to select it . It is questionable whether the human is hence exquisitely...If you want to puzzle a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay